| 29 | 0 | 11 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
[Objective]To explore the response mechanisms of different sorghum cultivars to salt stress during the germination stage,screen germplasm resources with excellent salt tolerance,and provide theoretical basis and material support for high-yield cultivation of sorghum in saline-alkali soils and breeding of salt-tolerant cultivars.[Method]10 sorghum cultivars were used as experimental materials.A 150 mmol/L NaCl solution was used to simulate the salt stress environment,with deionized water as the control.11 indicators were determined,such as germination potential,germination rate,germination index,vigor index,root-shoot ratio,fresh weight of sprout per plant,and dry weight of root per plant.After calculating the relative values of each indicator,comprehensive evaluation was performed through correlation analysis,principal component analysis,and membership function method,and salt tolerance grades were classified by cluster analysis.[Result]Salt stress had a significant impact on all indicators of sorghum during the germination stage.Except for the dry weight of individual roots,the other 10 indicators showed extremely significant differences among the treatments(P<0.01).The vigor index had the largest variation range(-75.2%),while the dry weight of individual roots had a relatively small variation range(26.1%).Correlation analysis showed that most indicators were significantly positively correlated;the correlation coefficient between germination potential and germination rate was higher(0.904),and the correlation coefficient between vigor index and individual shoot length reached 0.956.Principal component analysis extracted 3 comprehensive factors with a cumulative contribution rate of 88.589%,identifying germination rate and vigor index as the core evaluation indicators.Based on cluster analysis of comprehensive evaluation values(D values),the 10 materials were divided into 4 categories:highly salt-tolerant,salt-tolerant,moderately salt-tolerant,and salt-sensitive.Among them,cultivar 8(D=0.94) had the strongest salt tolerance,and cultivar 20(D=0.05) had the weakest.[Conclusion]There are significant genotypic differences in salt tolerance among the tested sorghum germplasms during the germination stage.The screened highly salt-tolerant cultivars can provide high-quality parental materials for sorghum cultivation in saline-alkali soils and genetic improvement.
[1] 杨真,王宝山.中国盐渍土资源现状及改良利用对策[J].山东农业科学,2015,47(4):125-130
[2] 阿曼姑·艾麦尔艾力,乃比·阿不来提,李陈建,等.盐胁迫对 6 个品种饲用甜高粱种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J].种子,2024,43(5):137-146.
[3] Zhu J K.Plant salt tolerance[J].Trends in plant science,2001,6(2):66-71.
[4] 赵可夫,冯立田.中国盐生植物资源[M].北京:科学出版社,2001:32-43.
[5] Chinnusamy V,Jagendorf A,Zhu J K.Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants[J].Crop Science,2005,45:437-448.
[6] Chinnusamy V,Zhu J K.Plant salt tolerance[M].Topics in Current Genetics,2003,4:241-270.
[7] 贾广云,张博,王玉祥.NaCl 胁迫对苦马豆种子萌发的影响及生理效应[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(8):181-184.
[8] 徐慧妮,王秀峰,孙旭东,等.黄瓜种子萌发对 NO-3 胁迫的响应及耐盐性评价[J].西北植物学报,2011,31(2):325-331.
[9] 杨小环,马金虎,郭数进,等.种子引发对盐胁迫下高粱种子萌发及幼苗生 长的 影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19 (1):103-109.
[10] 穆志新,李萌,秦慧彬.高粱芽期耐盐指标筛选及耐盐性评价[J].山西农业科学,2017,45(7):1075-1079.
[11] 徐鹏,李春宏,范昕琦,等.高粱CIPK家族基因的全基因组鉴定及非生物胁迫下的表达特征[J].江苏农业学报,2024,40(4):591-598.
[12] Kaur M,Gupta N,Kaur N,et al.Preliminary screening of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) germplasm for salinity stress tolerance at the early seedling stage[J].Cereal Research commuciations,2023,51(3):603-613.
[13] Beyaz R,Kir H.Physio-biochemical analyses in seedlings of sorghum-sudangrass hybrids that are grown under salt stress under in vitro conditions[J].Turkish journal of biochemistry,2020,45(2):177-184.
[14] Desoky E S M,Merwad A R M,Rady M M.Natural biostimulants improve saline soil characteristics and salt stressed-Sorghum performance[J].Communication in siol science and plant analysis,2018,49(8):967-983.
[15] Zhou X Y,Tian Y M,Qu Z P,et al.Comparing the salt tolerance of different spring soybean varieties at the germination stage[J].Plants,2023,12(15):2789.
[16] 周伟,余忠浩,孙思思,等.耐盐碱高粱亲缘关系分析及农艺性状评价[J].种子,2023,42(9):73-79.
[17] Kebebew F,McNeilly T.Variation in response of accessions of minor millets,Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke (pearl millet) and Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn (finger millet),and Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter (tef) to salinity in early seedling growth[J].Plant and soil,1995,175(2):311-321.
[18] 柴媛媛,史团省,谷卫彬,等.种子萌发期甜高粱对盐胁迫的响应及其耐盐性综合评价分析[J].种子,2008,27(2):43-47.
[19] 刘芳,付艳,高树仁,王振华.玉米幼苗的盐胁迫反应及玉米耐盐性的鉴定.黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2007,19(6):22-26.
[20] 牛远,杨修艳,戴存凤,等.大豆芽期和苗期耐盐性评价指标筛选[J].大豆科学,2018,37(2):215-223.
[21] 胡炎,杨帆,杨宁,等.盐碱地资源分析及利用研究展望[J].土壤通报,2023,54(2):489-494.
[22] 徐晓雪,孙飞,肖梦颖,等.高粱品种萌发期耐盐性筛选与鉴定[J].种子,2020,39(8):6-11.
[23] 郭冰玲,王润丰,王海莲,等.高粱种质资源萌发期耐盐性鉴定与筛选[J].山东农业科学,2024,56(9):43-50.
Basic Information:
China Classification Code:S514
Citation Information:
[1]CHEN Chao,TIAN Chang-jiu,YE Si-hong.Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance in Different Sorghum Cultivars Under Salt Stress[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2026,54(16):12-16+27.
Fund Information:
安徽省财政种业发展项目“特色经济作物优异种质资源挖掘利用”(2025ZY0306); 安徽省农业科学院自主创新项目《高粱种质资源收集、鉴定与利用》(2025YL031);安徽省农业科学院自主创新项目“薏苡等特色经济作物优异种质资源筛选与基因功能研究”(2026YL2023)
2025-12-22
2025
2026-01-11
2026-01-19
2026
1
2026-08-28
2026-08-28